Ramah and Roye Swank of Ottawa Kansas were involved in a car accident in Polk county Missouri. Ramah Swank was killed and Roye Swank was seriously injured in this terrible accident on Hwy 13 in Humansville, MO. According to the Missouri Highway Patrol and its investigating officer Sgt. K Mills the accident occurred on March 12, 2013 at approximately 11:45 p.m. The details of the preliminary police report establish that Roye Swank age 86 was the driver of a 1999 Chevy Pickup and Raham Swank was the passenger. The 1999 Chevy was traveling on Hwy 13 when a 1999 GMC van driven by Ralph Williams of Flemington, MO pulled into its path trying to cross the highway. The Chevy pickup then collided with the GMC van.
Roye Swank was transported to Cox South Hospital in Springfield, MO and Mr. Swank was taken to a funeral home in Humansville. Both the occupants of the GMC van were transported to area hospitals.
Police Report (Online for 30 Days)
If you were seriously injured in an accident like this you need to obtain an
experienced personal injury lawyer to investigate the facts and
determine whom is at fault. If you or a
loved one find themselves in need of an experienced personal injury lawyer please contact the attorneys of Copley Roth and Wilson LLC. Our firm has extensive experience handling personal injury and wrongful death claims and is here to compassionately assist you in your time of need.
If you, a loved one, or a family member has suffered
the devastating , and oftentimes tragic consequences of a car accident,
please do not hesitate to contact Copley Roth and Wilson,
LLC (913-451-9500) to address any questions or concerns you may have.
The initial consultation(s) telephone and in person, are always free.
Friday, March 15, 2013
Ottawa Kansas Couple in serious car accident in Polk County Missouri
Labels:
accident ramah swank,
accident roye swank,
ramah swank,
ramah swank accident,
roye swank,
roye swank accident
New York case may have big impact on Prenuptial agreements
Came across this article in the New York Post. It isn't binding on Kansas Courts but I did find it pretty interesting that New York had kind of thrown aside so many years of favoring the terms of a contract over the words that supposedly modified it.
By: Kieran Crowly and Dan Mangan of the New York Post
The divorce “floodgates” have been opened for married folks to claim they were bullied into signing prenups after The Post revealed a landmark court decision that tossed out a Long Island couple’s agreement, lawyers said yesterday. “It gives those litigants a leg to stand on,” famed Christie Brinkley divorce lawyer Robert Wallack said about a February appellate panel ruling that voided a prenup between a Nassau County real-estate executive and his wife. The Brooklyn Appellate Court panel ruled that Peter Petrakis, who controls $20 million in real estate, had “fraudulently induced” his wife, Elizabeth, to sign their prenup four days before their wedding.
Peter, the panel found, threatened to call off the wedding if Elizabeth didn’t sign. She felt coerced because her dad had already paid $40,000 for a reception. Elizabeth claimed Peter verbally promised to rip up the prenup once they had kids. They eventually had three. Peter claims he never made that promise. The panel found his credibility “suspect.”
The Petrakis case is “shocking,” Wallack said, because “it is the first time the court has accepted verbal promises over what is written in the agreement. “The problem with that is that you have courts getting involved in this credibility debate and deciding who to believe . . . we always used to rely on what’s in the writing.” “It’s a really dangerous, slippery slope,” said the lawyer, who repped Brinkley in her split from her fourth hubby, Peter Cook. Cook had challenged his prenup with the supermodel, but they ended up agreeing to a $2.1 million settlement. The Petrakis ruling allows Elizabeth’s divorce case to proceed — with no prenup. Her lawyer, Dennis D’Antonio, said he had gotten more than 20 messages yesterday morning from people wanting to challenge their own prenups — and from other lawyers who had such clients.
Marilyn Chinitz, a top Manhattan matrimonial lawyer, said it was a new era for divorce cases. “This opens up, in my opinion, a floodgate of litigation because the appellate court did not specifically detail the matters they were relying on in affirming the lower court’s decision,” said Chinitz, whose clients have included Michael Douglas and Tom Cruise. She said the ruling was “not a good decision for those who enter into prenuptial agreements because they expect for agreements to be honored by both the courts and the parties.” Jeffrey Cohen, who represented “Catch-22” author Joseph Heller and rocker Lou Reed in their splits, called the decision “a fairly dangerous precedent” that “is going to be a weapon to be used whenever anyone wants to say coercion was used” to get them to sign a prenup.
By: Kieran Crowly and Dan Mangan of the New York Post
The divorce “floodgates” have been opened for married folks to claim they were bullied into signing prenups after The Post revealed a landmark court decision that tossed out a Long Island couple’s agreement, lawyers said yesterday. “It gives those litigants a leg to stand on,” famed Christie Brinkley divorce lawyer Robert Wallack said about a February appellate panel ruling that voided a prenup between a Nassau County real-estate executive and his wife. The Brooklyn Appellate Court panel ruled that Peter Petrakis, who controls $20 million in real estate, had “fraudulently induced” his wife, Elizabeth, to sign their prenup four days before their wedding.
Peter, the panel found, threatened to call off the wedding if Elizabeth didn’t sign. She felt coerced because her dad had already paid $40,000 for a reception. Elizabeth claimed Peter verbally promised to rip up the prenup once they had kids. They eventually had three. Peter claims he never made that promise. The panel found his credibility “suspect.”
The Petrakis case is “shocking,” Wallack said, because “it is the first time the court has accepted verbal promises over what is written in the agreement. “The problem with that is that you have courts getting involved in this credibility debate and deciding who to believe . . . we always used to rely on what’s in the writing.” “It’s a really dangerous, slippery slope,” said the lawyer, who repped Brinkley in her split from her fourth hubby, Peter Cook. Cook had challenged his prenup with the supermodel, but they ended up agreeing to a $2.1 million settlement. The Petrakis ruling allows Elizabeth’s divorce case to proceed — with no prenup. Her lawyer, Dennis D’Antonio, said he had gotten more than 20 messages yesterday morning from people wanting to challenge their own prenups — and from other lawyers who had such clients.
Marilyn Chinitz, a top Manhattan matrimonial lawyer, said it was a new era for divorce cases. “This opens up, in my opinion, a floodgate of litigation because the appellate court did not specifically detail the matters they were relying on in affirming the lower court’s decision,” said Chinitz, whose clients have included Michael Douglas and Tom Cruise. She said the ruling was “not a good decision for those who enter into prenuptial agreements because they expect for agreements to be honored by both the courts and the parties.” Jeffrey Cohen, who represented “Catch-22” author Joseph Heller and rocker Lou Reed in their splits, called the decision “a fairly dangerous precedent” that “is going to be a weapon to be used whenever anyone wants to say coercion was used” to get them to sign a prenup.
Tuesday, March 12, 2013
Judge Dismisses suit against lawyer in divorce case
Judge Dismisses suit against lawyer in divorce case.
By Joe Beck
A Winchester judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed by a local attorney against his former wife's divorce attorney. Judge Joanne F. Alper ruled Feb. 27 that Phillip S. Griffin h
ad failed to state a claim that supported his suit against William E. Shmidheiser III of Harrisonburg.
In an interview Monday, Shmidheiser said he believed the suit was motivated by hard feelings stemming from the divorce case. I think I said at the time I trusted in the system to dispose of the lawsuit, that it was a crazy lawsuit," Shmidheiser said. "I trusted in the system, and the system repaid that trust." Griffin's lawsuit accused Shmidheiser of committing perjury, fraud and misrepresentation. Other accusations included defamation and violations of the Fair Debt Collection and Fair Credit Reporting acts.
The suit sought $2 million from Shmidheiser and his law firm.
Shmidheiser said the divorce case, which was still pending at the time the suit was filed, has been settled. Shmidheiser began representing Griffin's former wife, Kathryn Obenshain Griffin, in Winchester Circuit Court in 2006. A judge sealed the divorce records at Shmidheiser's request in 2007.
Shmidheiser sounded confident that the case is over, although Griffin has 30 days to file an appeal to the Virginia Supreme Court.
"It was just annoying to me because it got so much widespread publicity," Shmidheiser said of the lawsuit. "I'm happy to have it over."
A Winchester judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed by a local attorney against his former wife's divorce attorney. Judge Joanne F. Alper ruled Feb. 27 that Phillip S. Griffin h
ad failed to state a claim that supported his suit against William E. Shmidheiser III of Harrisonburg.
In an interview Monday, Shmidheiser said he believed the suit was motivated by hard feelings stemming from the divorce case. I think I said at the time I trusted in the system to dispose of the lawsuit, that it was a crazy lawsuit," Shmidheiser said. "I trusted in the system, and the system repaid that trust." Griffin's lawsuit accused Shmidheiser of committing perjury, fraud and misrepresentation. Other accusations included defamation and violations of the Fair Debt Collection and Fair Credit Reporting acts.
The suit sought $2 million from Shmidheiser and his law firm.
Shmidheiser said the divorce case, which was still pending at the time the suit was filed, has been settled. Shmidheiser began representing Griffin's former wife, Kathryn Obenshain Griffin, in Winchester Circuit Court in 2006. A judge sealed the divorce records at Shmidheiser's request in 2007.
Shmidheiser sounded confident that the case is over, although Griffin has 30 days to file an appeal to the Virginia Supreme Court.
"It was just annoying to me because it got so much widespread publicity," Shmidheiser said of the lawsuit. "I'm happy to have it over."
Monday, March 4, 2013
February 15, begins the busiest time for Divorce Lawyers
Ran across this article and thought it was interesting.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Valentine’s Day is supposed to be about love and romance. But unfortunately, it can be just the opposite. Because of that, Feb. 15 starts the busy season for divorce lawyers, as people who were unhappy with their marriages heading into the day often decide that they no longer want to be with the one they used to love.
A study of divorce filings in New York, Illinois and California by AttorneyFee.com, a legal referral site, found that February is the busiest month of the year for divorce filings, up about 18% from the average month. And those seeking referrals for a divorce lawyer on the site increase 38% following the holiday, with the biggest spike on the day after Valentine’s.
Another legal site, Avvo.com, reports a 40% increase in those seeking information and advice about divorce in the period right after Valentine’s Day. “There’s a very large number of people who are considering the divorce all the time, deciding whether or not to file,” said Richard Komaiko, a co-founder of AttorneyFee. “On Valentine’s Day, they take stock of things.”
Komaiko said February has factors other than the holiday that could lead to an increase in divorces. January is the busiest month of the year for bankruptcy filings, highlighting the financial problems that often divide couples. In addition, the cold weather of February can keep couples that are having trouble indoors and closer to each other, adding to problems.
But Alton Abramowitz, president of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, believes the holiday itself often brings things to a head for couples who are having trouble. “There’s always the clients who come in a day or two after saying ‘I can’t believe it, I made this beautiful dinner for my husband for Valentine’s Day, he called to say he was stuck in the office and then didn’t come home at all.” Abramowitz said for a person who is being unfaithful to a spouse, the day can create problems that lead to them finally getting caught.
“The person who is cheating is caught in the middle; they have to satisfy the spouse and their lover, and more often than not that’s an impossible feat to achieve,” he said.
NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Valentine’s Day is supposed to be about love and romance. But unfortunately, it can be just the opposite. Because of that, Feb. 15 starts the busy season for divorce lawyers, as people who were unhappy with their marriages heading into the day often decide that they no longer want to be with the one they used to love.
A study of divorce filings in New York, Illinois and California by AttorneyFee.com, a legal referral site, found that February is the busiest month of the year for divorce filings, up about 18% from the average month. And those seeking referrals for a divorce lawyer on the site increase 38% following the holiday, with the biggest spike on the day after Valentine’s.
Another legal site, Avvo.com, reports a 40% increase in those seeking information and advice about divorce in the period right after Valentine’s Day. “There’s a very large number of people who are considering the divorce all the time, deciding whether or not to file,” said Richard Komaiko, a co-founder of AttorneyFee. “On Valentine’s Day, they take stock of things.”
Komaiko said February has factors other than the holiday that could lead to an increase in divorces. January is the busiest month of the year for bankruptcy filings, highlighting the financial problems that often divide couples. In addition, the cold weather of February can keep couples that are having trouble indoors and closer to each other, adding to problems.
But Alton Abramowitz, president of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, believes the holiday itself often brings things to a head for couples who are having trouble. “There’s always the clients who come in a day or two after saying ‘I can’t believe it, I made this beautiful dinner for my husband for Valentine’s Day, he called to say he was stuck in the office and then didn’t come home at all.” Abramowitz said for a person who is being unfaithful to a spouse, the day can create problems that lead to them finally getting caught.
“The person who is cheating is caught in the middle; they have to satisfy the spouse and their lover, and more often than not that’s an impossible feat to achieve,” he said.
Labels:
divorce lawyer in johnson county,
divorce lawyer in kansas city,
divorce lawyer in olathe,
divorce lawyer in overland park
Linwood Man injured in Leavenworth County Wreck
A 36 year old Linwood man was seriously injured after a car accident in Leavenworth County. According to the Kansas Highway Patrol, Christopher Collins of Linwood was seriously injured on a February 25, 2013 wreck involving another vehicle. The injuries were severe enough as to cause Mr. Collins to be sent to KU Med in Kansas City. Per the police report, the accident happened when a 2006 Ford F150 driven by Michael McCleary also of Linwood, failed to yield the right of way and as he attempted to pull onto 206th st. He crossed the path of Mr. Collins and Mr. Collin's 1988 Chevrolet struck the F150. Both vehicles were towed from the scene.
The Police report for this accident will be posted for 30 days.
If you were seriously injured in an accident like this you need to obtain an experienced personal injury lawyer to investigate the facts and determine whom is at fault. If you or a loved one find themselves in need of an experienced personal injury lawyer please contact the attorneys of Copley Roth and Wilson LLC. Our firm has extensive experience handling personal injury and wrongful death claims and is here to compassionately assist you in your time of need. If you, a loved one, or a family member has suffered the devastating , and oftentimes tragic consequences of a car accident, please do not hesitate to contact Copley Roth and Wilson, LLC (913-451-9500) to address any questions or concerns you may have. The initial consultation(s) telephone and in person, are always free.
The Police report for this accident will be posted for 30 days.
If you were seriously injured in an accident like this you need to obtain an experienced personal injury lawyer to investigate the facts and determine whom is at fault. If you or a loved one find themselves in need of an experienced personal injury lawyer please contact the attorneys of Copley Roth and Wilson LLC. Our firm has extensive experience handling personal injury and wrongful death claims and is here to compassionately assist you in your time of need. If you, a loved one, or a family member has suffered the devastating , and oftentimes tragic consequences of a car accident, please do not hesitate to contact Copley Roth and Wilson, LLC (913-451-9500) to address any questions or concerns you may have. The initial consultation(s) telephone and in person, are always free.
Labels:
accident Christopher Collins,
Christopher Collins,
Christopher Collins accident,
leavenworth County wreck
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Lawyer gets trapped in San Diego Jail on accident
Lawyer trapped for hours in San Diego Jail
-Associated Press
SAN DIEGO – An attorney says he went to the downtown San Diego jail to visit a client and ended up becoming a prisoner himself.
U-T San Diego reported Friday that Erubey Lopez got his visitor's badge and was escorted to the visiting room, but his client never came.
When Lopez tried to use an intercom to ask about the delay, it was broken. He yelled and banged on the door, but it took four hours for a guard to discover him and let him out. Sheriff's Cmdr. John Ingrassia confirmed the incident, calling it "unfortunate." Ingrassia says inmates are usually brought to the visiting room within a half hour, but Lopez' client was still being booked, passing between various deputies, so the message that he had a visitor was somehow lost.
U-T San Diego reported Friday that Erubey Lopez got his visitor's badge and was escorted to the visiting room, but his client never came.
When Lopez tried to use an intercom to ask about the delay, it was broken. He yelled and banged on the door, but it took four hours for a guard to discover him and let him out. Sheriff's Cmdr. John Ingrassia confirmed the incident, calling it "unfortunate." Ingrassia says inmates are usually brought to the visiting room within a half hour, but Lopez' client was still being booked, passing between various deputies, so the message that he had a visitor was somehow lost.
Believe it our not this type of stuff happens all the time. I have personally been stuck in "Sally cells" while visiting a criminal defendant in county jail on multiple occasions. It occurs most often when you go to visit more than one client. The jailors will loose track of you or there will be a shift change and they forget about you. Its is frustrating as can be.
Its still pretty funny when it doesn't happen to you.
Labels:
criminal defense lawyer,
lawyer gets stuck in jail on accident,
lawyer gets trapped in jail,
lawyer in jail
Friday, February 22, 2013
Utah State Trooper gives out Bogus DUI charges, finds herself in court
Yet another story of a law enforcement officer giving out Bogus DUI charges for personal gain...
Looks a lot like a similar story about the Chicago Officer who would give out bogus DUI cases so that he could get get overtime going to court I blogged about awhile ago...
http://blog.kcticketguy.com/2012/08/city-and-cop-sued-over-false-dui.html
It appears that the State of Utah finally realized they had a serious problem with a state trooper who was giving out a crazy number of DUI charges. At first they praised her, making her trooper of the year, but as her numbers grew and grew and a prosecutor began to question her veracity the State troopers eventually fired her. It was far too late as she had already cost many citizens guilty of nothing, to have criminal records and disrupted their lives as well as their pocket books.
Here is the remarkable story, that makes you wonder how much more of this is going on?
Utah State Trooper accused of making bogus DUI arrests
By: Brandy Mccombs
Looks a lot like a similar story about the Chicago Officer who would give out bogus DUI cases so that he could get get overtime going to court I blogged about awhile ago...
http://blog.kcticketguy.com/2012/08/city-and-cop-sued-over-false-dui.html
It appears that the State of Utah finally realized they had a serious problem with a state trooper who was giving out a crazy number of DUI charges. At first they praised her, making her trooper of the year, but as her numbers grew and grew and a prosecutor began to question her veracity the State troopers eventually fired her. It was far too late as she had already cost many citizens guilty of nothing, to have criminal records and disrupted their lives as well as their pocket books.
Here is the remarkable story, that makes you wonder how much more of this is going on?
Utah State Trooper accused of making bogus DUI arrests
By: Brandy Mccombs
During her 10 years as a Utah state trooper, Lisa Steed built a
reputation as an officer with a knack for nabbing drunken motorists in a
state with a long tradition of teetotaling and some of the nation's
strictest liquor laws. Steed used the uncanny talent -- as one supervisor once described it
-- to garner hundreds of arrests, setting records, earning praise as a
rising star and becoming the first woman to become trooper of the year.
Today, however, Steed is out of work, fired from the Utah Highway Patrol, and she -- and her former superiors -- are facing a lawsuit in which some of those she arrested allege she filed bogus DUI reports. "If we don't stand up to Lisa Steed or law enforcement, they just pull people over for whatever reason they want," said attorney Michael Studebaker. Steed declined to comment, but her attorney Greg Skordas said she denies the allegations. She is trying to get her job back.
The people snared by Steed say the arrests disrupted their lives and were costly to resolve. Michael Choate, a now-retired aircraft logistics specialist at Hill Air Force Base, said he nearly lost his security clearance and job. Steed stopped him because he was wearing a Halloween costume and booked him even though three breathalyzers tests showed no alcohol in his system. Choate said he spent $3,800 and had to take four days off of work to get his DUI charged dismissed. The 49-page lawsuit includes two defendants, but Studebaker said dozens of others are lined up and willing to tell their stories. He said they are requesting the lawsuit be broadened into a class action lawsuit.
Every one of her DUI stops back to at least 2006 should be under suspicion, he said, adding that could be as many as 1,500 people. The lawsuit, filed in December, also accuses the Utah Highway Patrol of ignoring Steed's patterns of higher-than-normal DUI bookings and waited too long to take her off patrol. The agency declined to comment. Steed joined the agency in 2002, and during her first five years, she earned a reputation as a hard-worker whose efficiency led to high arrest totals. By the time she ascended to trooper of the year in 2007, she was held up as one of the agency's top stars.
In 2009, Steed became a member of the DUI squad. Her 400 DUI arrests that year were thought to be a state record, and more than double the number made by any other highway trooper. She earned special recognition at the state Capitol. "With her training and experience, it's second nature for her to find these people who are driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol," her DUI squad boss at the time, Lt. Steve Winward, told the Deseret News. During a ride-along with the newspaper, Steed said it was simply a "numbers game," noting that one in every 10 drivers stopped for a violation is driving impaired. "It's a lot of hard work, but you make a ton of stops, and you're going to run into them," she said. Steed's career, however, turned. In 2012, while on the stand in a DUI court case, Steed acknowledged purposely leaving her microphone in her patrol car so that superiors wouldn't know she was violating agency policy.
By April 2012, her credibility had come into question so much that a prosecutor said he would no longer prosecute DUIs if Steed's testimony was the only evidence. In October, the Salt Lake Tribune obtained a memo written in May 2010 in which Utah Highway Patrol Sgt. Rob Nixon flagged Steed's "pattern" of questionable DUI arrests. He wrote that the bulk of Steed's arrestees had no signs of "impairing drugs" in their systems. The memo said she based most of her arrests on signs of impairment such as dilated pupils and leg and body tremors. Steed was taken off road patrol in April 2012 and fired in November. She was accused of violating department policies, falsifying police reports and using questionable practices when making DUI arrests.
The lawsuit is based on two defendants: Thomas Romero and Julie Tapia.
Romero was stopped after Steed said he was swerving, according to the lawsuit. After Romero said he wasn't drinking, Steed gave him a roadside sobriety test anyway. She booked him for DUI even though his blood alcohol content was 0.00. Charges were dismissed.
Tapia went to pick up her ex-husband, who had been drinking. Steed approached Tapia as she got out of her car at her house, saying Tapia had been speeding, the lawsuit said. Steed said she could smell alcohol, and Tapia told her it was coming from her ex-husband. Tapia was arrested for a DUI; her ex-husband for public intoxication. Tapia's blood test showed no alcohol. Charges were dropped.
Choate, who hopes to join the lawsuit, said the entire agency should be held responsible for the damage Steed caused to him and others. "They let her get away with it for a long time," he said.
Today, however, Steed is out of work, fired from the Utah Highway Patrol, and she -- and her former superiors -- are facing a lawsuit in which some of those she arrested allege she filed bogus DUI reports. "If we don't stand up to Lisa Steed or law enforcement, they just pull people over for whatever reason they want," said attorney Michael Studebaker. Steed declined to comment, but her attorney Greg Skordas said she denies the allegations. She is trying to get her job back.
The people snared by Steed say the arrests disrupted their lives and were costly to resolve. Michael Choate, a now-retired aircraft logistics specialist at Hill Air Force Base, said he nearly lost his security clearance and job. Steed stopped him because he was wearing a Halloween costume and booked him even though three breathalyzers tests showed no alcohol in his system. Choate said he spent $3,800 and had to take four days off of work to get his DUI charged dismissed. The 49-page lawsuit includes two defendants, but Studebaker said dozens of others are lined up and willing to tell their stories. He said they are requesting the lawsuit be broadened into a class action lawsuit.
Every one of her DUI stops back to at least 2006 should be under suspicion, he said, adding that could be as many as 1,500 people. The lawsuit, filed in December, also accuses the Utah Highway Patrol of ignoring Steed's patterns of higher-than-normal DUI bookings and waited too long to take her off patrol. The agency declined to comment. Steed joined the agency in 2002, and during her first five years, she earned a reputation as a hard-worker whose efficiency led to high arrest totals. By the time she ascended to trooper of the year in 2007, she was held up as one of the agency's top stars.
In 2009, Steed became a member of the DUI squad. Her 400 DUI arrests that year were thought to be a state record, and more than double the number made by any other highway trooper. She earned special recognition at the state Capitol. "With her training and experience, it's second nature for her to find these people who are driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol," her DUI squad boss at the time, Lt. Steve Winward, told the Deseret News. During a ride-along with the newspaper, Steed said it was simply a "numbers game," noting that one in every 10 drivers stopped for a violation is driving impaired. "It's a lot of hard work, but you make a ton of stops, and you're going to run into them," she said. Steed's career, however, turned. In 2012, while on the stand in a DUI court case, Steed acknowledged purposely leaving her microphone in her patrol car so that superiors wouldn't know she was violating agency policy.
By April 2012, her credibility had come into question so much that a prosecutor said he would no longer prosecute DUIs if Steed's testimony was the only evidence. In October, the Salt Lake Tribune obtained a memo written in May 2010 in which Utah Highway Patrol Sgt. Rob Nixon flagged Steed's "pattern" of questionable DUI arrests. He wrote that the bulk of Steed's arrestees had no signs of "impairing drugs" in their systems. The memo said she based most of her arrests on signs of impairment such as dilated pupils and leg and body tremors. Steed was taken off road patrol in April 2012 and fired in November. She was accused of violating department policies, falsifying police reports and using questionable practices when making DUI arrests.
The lawsuit is based on two defendants: Thomas Romero and Julie Tapia.
Romero was stopped after Steed said he was swerving, according to the lawsuit. After Romero said he wasn't drinking, Steed gave him a roadside sobriety test anyway. She booked him for DUI even though his blood alcohol content was 0.00. Charges were dismissed.
Tapia went to pick up her ex-husband, who had been drinking. Steed approached Tapia as she got out of her car at her house, saying Tapia had been speeding, the lawsuit said. Steed said she could smell alcohol, and Tapia told her it was coming from her ex-husband. Tapia was arrested for a DUI; her ex-husband for public intoxication. Tapia's blood test showed no alcohol. Charges were dropped.
Choate, who hopes to join the lawsuit, said the entire agency should be held responsible for the damage Steed caused to him and others. "They let her get away with it for a long time," he said.
Labels:
bad dui charges,
bogus dui arrest,
DUI attorney,
dui charges in kansas,
dui lawyer,
dui penalty,
Kansas dui lawyer
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
