Friday, March 29, 2013

Horrible accident in Greene County causes two deaths.

A terrible accident claimed the life of two men in Republic Missouri.  Lawrence Coan, age 65, of Kimberling City  and Corey Gresham, age 41, of Macon were both killed in the accident on US 60.  According to the Missouri Highway Patrol and the investigating officers, Trooper Richardson, Mchknight, Bible, and others the accident happened when 3 passenger vehicles were stopped in the right lane of US 60 a semi truck was stopped in the left lane for a traffic signal.


A 2006 Freightliner operated by Lei Sun, a 31 year old male from Alhambra California, struck one of the vehicles (a 2011 Chevy Pickup) in the rear and then pushed it into the other stationary vehicles.(a (2011 Nissan Altima)  This chain reaction injured both men.

This accident occurred at 9:03 a.m. and both men were taken to Springfield Mortuary in Springfield, MO.

Police Report - Only Available online for 30 Days

When seriously injured in an accident like this you need to obtain an experienced personal injury lawyer to investigate the facts and determine whom is at fault.   If you or a loved one find themselves in need of an experienced personal injury lawyer please contact the attorneys of Copley Roth and Wilson LLC.  Our firm has extensive experience handling personal injury and wrongful death claims and is here to compassionately assist you in your time of need. If you, a loved one, or a family member has suffered the devastating , and oftentimes tragic consequences of a car accident, please do not hesitate to contact Copley Roth and Wilson, LLC (913-451-9500) to address any questions or concerns you may have.  The initial consultation(s) telephone and in person, are always free.

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

What are the benifits to filing for divorce before my husband/wife?

Found this article on Forbes.  Author is Jeff Landers.  Pretty interesting and useful food for thought.



Over the years, I’ve had several clients who felt blindsided when their husbands announced intentions to divorce. Some thought all was well enough in their marriage; others knew there were problems, but didn’t think the issues were insurmountable. Whatever the circumstances, divorce can sometimes come as a complete shock.  More often, though, wives have at least an inkling divorce could be on the horizon. Typically, both spouses sense the marriage is on borrowed time, and quite frequently each one is privately considering legally ending the relationship.


If that’s where your marriage stands right now, you may be wondering if you are any better off, financially and/or legally, if you file for divorce before your husband does.
Well, that’s a very good question, and the answer is somewhat complex. While it certainly doesn’t make sense to race your husband to the courthouse out of mere spite, or for the thin and fleeting satisfaction of winning at “gotcha,” there are legitimate reasons to consider filing first, if you have a choice. Here are a few of the most important factors you need to consider:

Financial Advantages of Filing First

You can have your divorce team lined up in advance.
Assembling the right team of qualified experts to help you achieve the best possible outcome from your divorce can take some time. You will need an excellent attorney, of course, and in financially complex divorces, it’s also essential to have a qualified divorce financial analyst  on your side. At a minimum, I also recommend a good therapist to help you through, as well as a vocational expert if you plan to re-enter the job market.

You can gather all the documentation you will need before the divorce begins.
It is critically important to have in your secure possession copies of all relevant financial and legal documents. These include not only bank and brokerage statements and tax returns, but also insurance policies, wills and trusts, retirement account statements, real estate records, vehicle registrations, etc. (See my Divorce Financial Checklist for a comprehensive list.) Locating and copying all these documents can take considerable time and effort, particularly if your husband is controlling or secretive where finances are concerned. Filing first means that you’ll have all your documentation organized and in a secure location before divorce papers are served.

You can ensure you have access to funds and credit before you file.

As soon as you think divorce is in your future, you should immediately begin to set aside money for the expenses involved. Make sure you have enough money to hire your divorce team; it is a critical investment in your financial future. Also, if you don’t have a credit card in your own name – and you absolutely should! – obtain one as soon as possible, as it may be hard to do so later.
(More advice for taking the first steps towards divorce are available in my earlier blog post, Five Best Financial Tips For Women Divorcing In 2013.)

Filing first may prevent your husband from hiding assets.
Deplorable as it is, many husbands hide assets during the divorce process. Filing first, particularly if you live in a state which requires an Automatic Temporary Restraining Order (ATRO), may help guard against any underhanded tactics.

Legal Advantages of Filing First

Filing first lets you choose where your divorce will be adjudicated.
Divorces are generally decided in the jurisdiction in which they are filed. If you and your husband have already separated and live in different counties or states, or if you spend equal time at homes in Connecticut and New York, for example, it is worth your while to check into the legal implications of filing in the different venues legitimately available to you. State laws can be widely different regarding such crucial considerations as child custody customs and division of marital assets, including whether or not an ATRO is part of the process. Your experience and expected outcome might vary widely in different jurisdictions. Do your research, and consult with attorneys wherever you might file.  As Laura A. Wasser , Divorce Attorney to stars like Maria Shriver, Heidi Klum, Angelina Jolie, Christina Aguilera, Mariah Carey, Britney Spears and many others, told me, filing jurisdiction can have a significant impact on virtually every issue of the divorce process.

“While in ideal circumstances couples divorce where they live, hiring lawyers or mediators whose offices are convenient for both to get to, the fact is that the filing jurisdiction will influence the outcome of every issue that may arise in the divorce proceeding—child custody, child support, spousal support, division of property,” she said. “That’s why it is so important to know your own state’s practices concerning the key issues.”  You may thwart some dirty tricks your husband could try to pull.  In particular, it may save you from falling victim to the trick known as “conflicting out,” by which the husband meets for quick consultations with all the best divorce attorneys in the area, thereby rendering them unable to serve the wife because they now have an attorney-client relationship with the husband.

I asked Laura to expand on this point, as well.  “In a great many law firms—including mine —you will be routed first to a gatekeeper before an actual lawyer gets on the line. In my case, it’s my secretary who runs a brief but fairly substantive screening process. She will take down basic information like your name, your spouse’s name, how long you’ve been married, how many kids you have, where you are filing your case, and the like,” she said. “The screening process runs a quick check of our database to make sure, for example, that your spouse didn’t phone us a year ago and come in for a meeting in which confidential information was relayed; that would mean I couldn’t represent you. Remember the famous episode of The Sopranos in which Tony’s putative new neighbor, a slimy lawyer if ever there was one, advises him to make appointments with all the top divorce lawyers in North Jersey so Carmela won’t be able to find legal representation? It worked, too; in a later episode, she freaked out at this further evidence of Tony’s controlling ways. We watch out for that sort of thing in this initial screening process.”  You’ll be able to learn more insights from Laura in her upcoming book, It Doesn’t Have to Be That Way; How to Divorce Without Destroying Your Family or Bankrupting Yourself, due out this fall from St. Martin’s Press
.
The “first to file” may be the first litigant to present his or her case at trial.  But think carefully before you do. Debra DiMaggio a divorce attorney in Illinois, tells her clients there are pros and cons to presenting first.  “On one hand, if you’re the wronged spouse, you may feel the need to be the first to file for emotional reasons. No one wants to be the ‘rejected’ spouse,” she explained to me. “But on the other hand, you may not want to reveal your strategy to the other side, who can then adjust his or her presentation accordingly.”  Debra’s advice is straightforward.

“In my opinion, if a spouse senses trouble in the marriage he or she should immediately meet with an attorney to obtain information about the law and gain practical insight about the process,” she said. “After interviewing a qualified domestic relations practitioner, that spouse will have a keener sense of his or her spouse’s intentions with respect to the marriage going forward.”

I agree wholeheartedly with Debra. While I always encourage my clients to Think Financially, Not Emotionally, there is an emotional component to filing first which can’t be discounted. I don’t need to tell you that ending a marriage can be a wrenching, heartbreaking process. Once the decision is made, though, there can be some real emotional strength to be gained from taking the first tangible steps toward your new life as a single woman. You may find that making the initial legal filing provides the psychological leg-up you sorely need, and that feeling more in control of the process will help you see the divorce through to your best advantage.

Most importantly, however, you need to build a strong, qualified divorce team to guide you through the divorce proceedings and help you secure a solid financial future as an independent woman.

Monday, March 25, 2013

Dog fighting ring uncovered in Kansas and Missouri

This story just came across the KC Star.  It is pretty sad that people out their still fight animals for entertainment.

Two Kansas men charged with training fighting dogs in KCK.
AP


Federal authorities in Kansas said Monday that they broke up a dogfighting operation that included training pit bulls to fight in Kansas, Missouri and Texas by chaining the dogs to treadmills for hours at a time and using live chickens as bait.

Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/2013/03/25/4143224/two-kansas-men-charged-with-training.html#storylink=cpy


Pete Davis Jr. and Melvin L. Robinson were charged in a federal complaint in the U.S. District Court for Kansas with one count of transporting animals for participation in an animal fighting venture in interstate commerce, according to a federal complaint unsealed Monday. The charge carries up to five years in federal prison and a possible fine of up to $250,000.

The criminal complaint and other online court records did not list lawyers or hometowns for either defendant. Attempts to reach Davis and Robinson at phone listings under their names in Kansas were not successful Monday.  Jim Cross, spokesman for Kansas' U.S. Attorney Barry Grissom, declined to comment on the case Monday. Grissom has a news conference scheduled for later Monday about a “significant criminal investigation” that involves the FBI and the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Cross would not say if the charges against Davis and Robinson were the subject of that news conference.

The ASPCA, which said it removed nearly 100 dogs involved in the investigation, also helped law enforcement with a major dogfighting investigation in 2009 that led to charges against about two dozen people and the rescue of more than 400 dogs in Missouri, Illinois, Texas, Oklahoma, Iowa and Mississippi.

Tim Rickey, vice president of the ASPCA, said dogfighting remains a major problem.  “The situation has not changed,” he said Monday. “We do not feel like there has been any decline in animal fights. There is better awareness, but there continues to be a lack of enforcement because they're very difficult to investigate.”  Dogfighting, a federal felony, has come under renewed scrutiny since NFL star Michael Vick was convicted and served prison time for running a dogfighting ring. The Philadelphia Eagles quarterback has been working with the Humane Society of the United States to stop organized animal fighting.

In the complaint unsealed Monday in Kansas, an FBI special agent said two sources approached a Missouri law enforcement officer and the FBI about Davis “and his dog fighting ring.” According to the complaint, Davis and Robinson owned the dogs, most of which were pit bulls, and trained them for weekly dogfights in Harrison County, Mo., and fights in April in the Kansas City area and Dallas.
Robinson used a home in Kansas City, Kan., as a training site for the dogs, who were chained to treadmills for “several hours at a time,” the complaint said one of the sources told the FBI. The dogs also had weights on “to strengthen it,” and “caged live chickens were placed in front of each treadmill as `bait,“’ the complaint said.

The complaint said the bodies of three dead dogs were found on the farm the men used in Harrison County – two by one of the FBI informants and one by a Missouri law enforcement officer.
Davis and Robinson discussed betting $20,000 to $30,000 on the dog they were training for the Dallas fight, the complaint said.

The FBI paid one of the sources $1,900 and the other source $100, according to the complaint. One of the sources had no previous convictions, but the other had prior convictions, including for felony theft and transportation of a woman for prostitution.

Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/2013/03/25/4143224/two-kansas-men-charged-with-training.html#storylink=cpy