Three players have been arrested in the last nine days? Maybe the NFL needs to hand down more punishment for players that are busted for DUI. That is just what it seems they are trying to do. It looks like the union and the owners have been talking about this for sometime but the owners don't want to make the necessary concessions to make it happen.
In, my opinion I don't think they need to focus on more stiff punishment for players accused of drunk driving. But maybe if they are convicted of a drunk driving offense then more on field sanctions would be reasonable. The simple fact of the matter is that when a regular person gets a DUI charge they may face negative ramifications at their place of employment. The players should be held to that same standard. To enforce some sort of punishment based on just a "charge" or a better term is aqcusation of drunk driving simply isn't fair. After all, they should be presumed innocent.
Here is the article that inspired this post.
NFL has been pushing for increased DUI discipline
by Mike Florio
After a rash of recent DUI arrests, with three players popped in nine
days for driving drunk, it’s obvious that whatever the NFL is doing to
prevent players from possibly killing paying customers isn’t working. Mike Lupica of the New York Daily News agrees that more
needs to be done. “A guy over the legal limit for alcohol behind the
wheel of a car, in fact, is as dangerous as a football player like Plaxico Burress going into a crowded club and having a couple of drinks with a loaded unlicensed handgun in his pants,” Lupica contends.
He’s right. And, actually, a small piece of metal whizzing around a
bar may be less dangerous than a 2,000-pound chunk of it flying down the
street. Per a source with knowledge of the NFL’s thinking, the league has
wanted to increase the penalties for several years. The league
contends, we’re told, that the union has resisted. In fairness to the NFLPA, however, the league could get higher DUI penalties if the league was willing to make the kind of concession
necessary to get the union to agree. If, for example, the NFL were willing to export the appeals process
for violations of the substance-abuse policy to a neutral arbitrator,
the players may be willing to allow that arbitrator to uphold or reject
the stiffer proposed punishments for players who drive drunk.
Thus, while the NFLPA understandably is protecting the rights of men
who technically are on their own time and who face consequences via the
criminal justice system, both sides need to come together and look at
the bigger picture. Ultimately, this is an entertainment business. And the men providing
the entertainment shouldn’t randomly be endangering the lives of the
folks they’re trying to entertain, either by driving drunk or by throwing swords into the stands.
No comments:
Post a Comment