Kathleen Mcmillin, of Harrisonville Missouri was seriously injured in a April 24, 2013 accident. According to the Missouri Highway Patrol and the investigating officer Sgt. A.J. Bell the accident occurred at 7:10 a.m. on westbound Missouri Highway 2 just one mile east of Route O. According to the preliminary investigation, driver Justin Saling, age 20, of Paola Kansas was driving a 1999 Ford, Mr. Saling lost control on an ice covered roadway, and slammed into a 2007 Suzuki. The 2007 Suzuki was owned and driven by Kathleen Mcmillin. The 1999 Ford was then struck by a third vehicle a 2003 Oldsmobile. Both Kathleen Mcmillin and Jsting Saling were transported to medical facilities for treatment. Kathleen Mcmillin was transported to Research Medical by Air Ambulance, and Mr. Saling was transported to Cass Regional. Follow up condition is unknown.
Police Report (online for 30 Days)
When
seriously injured in an incident like this you need to obtain an
experienced personal injury lawyer to investigate the facts and
determine whom is at fault. If you or a
loved one find themselves in need of an experienced personal injury lawyer please contact the attorneys of Copley Roth and Wilson LLC. Our firm has extensive experience handling personal injury and wrongful death claims and is here to compassionately assist you in your time of need.
If you, a loved one, or a family member has suffered
the devastating , and oftentimes tragic consequences of failed security,
please do not hesitate to contact Copley Roth and Wilson,
LLC (913-451-9500) to address any questions or concerns you may have.
The initial consultation(s) telephone and in person, are always free.
Friday, April 26, 2013
Wednesday, April 24, 2013
Former Kansas Cheer coach convicted of 10 sexual crimes with cheerleaders
This article just came across the Kansas City Star. It looks like a Sedgwick County man was involved in all types of sexual exploits with 4 young girls whom he was supposed to be coaching. A jury found him guilty of ten counts and he has a sentencing set for June 14.Here is the Kansas City Star article.
By: Hurst Laviana of the Wichita Eagle
A former cheer coach is facing the possibility of life in prison after being convicted Tuesday of molesting four of his underage students.
A Sedgwick County jury deliberated just two hours before finding
Timothy Wells-Lee guilty of 10 of 11 charges filed against him.
Wells-Lee, 29, could get a life term when he is sentenced June 14. District Attorney Marc Bennett said he was pleased with the verdict.
He said a sexual abuse case in some ways can be more difficult to prosecute than a murder case where there’s a body and other obvious evidence of a crime. “In a case like this, a young woman has to come forward and relive what hopefully will be the worst moment of her life,” he said. Wells-Lee was accused of having sexual relationships with girls while they ranged in age from 12 to 14. The 11 counts accused him of fondling, having oral sex and having sexual intercourse with the girls from 2006 through 2008. He was acquitted of the least serious of the 11 charges – a count that accused him of fondling one of the girls when she was 14.
All four girls testified at the trial, as did Wells-Lee. He denied having any sexual contact with three of the girls, and he said his sexual relationship with the fourth girl didn’t begin until after her 16th birthday. During his closing argument, Bennett asked whether there was any reason for any of the he girls to lie. “And not just one girl – four,” he said. “Why are they making the accusations? What motive is there?” Bennett urged the jury to consider each count on each girl on its own merits.
“This isn’t a thumbs-up or a thumbs-down to the whole thing,” he said.
Defense lawyer Roger Falk argued in his closing remarks that the dates and times that the girls said the abuse occurred didn’t coincide with actual events. He cited as an example the testimony of one girl who said she had sex with Wells-Lee in his apartment in March 2009 after he had moved to Oklahoma City.
“The dates don’t match up. The acts don’t match up,” he said. Deputy District Attorney Kim Parker, who had the final comments for the jury, said Wells-Lee used his position as the girls’ coach to take advantage of them sexually. “He ran the show with these little girls all during a time when he was 10 to 12 years older than they were,” she said. “He took advantage of their immaturity all for his own sexual gratification.”
He said a sexual abuse case in some ways can be more difficult to prosecute than a murder case where there’s a body and other obvious evidence of a crime. “In a case like this, a young woman has to come forward and relive what hopefully will be the worst moment of her life,” he said. Wells-Lee was accused of having sexual relationships with girls while they ranged in age from 12 to 14. The 11 counts accused him of fondling, having oral sex and having sexual intercourse with the girls from 2006 through 2008. He was acquitted of the least serious of the 11 charges – a count that accused him of fondling one of the girls when she was 14.
All four girls testified at the trial, as did Wells-Lee. He denied having any sexual contact with three of the girls, and he said his sexual relationship with the fourth girl didn’t begin until after her 16th birthday. During his closing argument, Bennett asked whether there was any reason for any of the he girls to lie. “And not just one girl – four,” he said. “Why are they making the accusations? What motive is there?” Bennett urged the jury to consider each count on each girl on its own merits.
“This isn’t a thumbs-up or a thumbs-down to the whole thing,” he said.
Defense lawyer Roger Falk argued in his closing remarks that the dates and times that the girls said the abuse occurred didn’t coincide with actual events. He cited as an example the testimony of one girl who said she had sex with Wells-Lee in his apartment in March 2009 after he had moved to Oklahoma City.
“The dates don’t match up. The acts don’t match up,” he said. Deputy District Attorney Kim Parker, who had the final comments for the jury, said Wells-Lee used his position as the girls’ coach to take advantage of them sexually. “He ran the show with these little girls all during a time when he was 10 to 12 years older than they were,” she said. “He took advantage of their immaturity all for his own sexual gratification.”
Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/2013/04/23/4197907/jury-begins-deliberations-in-trial.html#storylink=cpy
Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/2013/04/23/4197907/jury-begins-deliberations-in-trial.html#storylink=cpy
Friday, April 19, 2013
Supreme Court upholds your constitutional rights!
Here is an article in the Kansas City Star talking about the decision.
U.S. Supreme Court denies Missouri's push for
warrantless blood tests in DUI cases
By: Brian Burnes of the KC Star
Missouri’s push to more easily draw blood from people suspected of driving drunk failed to convince U.S. Supreme Court justices Wednesday. Law enforcement must continue to seek warrants to take blood from drivers stopped for possibly driving impaired, the court ruled in a case that originated in southeast Missouri. More than 30 other states and the Obama administration had joined Missouri in asking justices to give officers almost complete discretion in drawing blood samples without a warrant.
The ruling thrilled Doug Bonney, chief counsel with the American Civil Liberties Union of Kansas and Western Missouri office in Kansas City.
“It shows that the court understood that drunk-driving laws can be enforced in a way that is consistent with the Constitution,” said Bonney, referring to the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.
At least the court left in place current procedures for obtaining such blood tests, said Eric Zahnd, Platte County prosecutor who also is head of the Missouri Association of Prosecuting Attorneys.
“The good news is that those tests will still be an arrow in the quiver of law enforcement in appropriate circumstances,” Zahnd said. “I am heartened that the court continues to recognize that alcohol dissipates naturally from the blood and therefore time is of the essence in these cases.”
The Supreme Court held that police usually must try to obtain a search warrant from a judge before ordering blood tests for drunken-driving suspects.
In their 8-1 ruling, justices sided with a Missouri man who had been subjected to a blood test without a warrant and was found to have nearly twice the legal limit of alcohol in his blood. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote for the court that the natural dissipation of alcohol in the blood is generally not sufficient reason to dispense with the requirement that police get a judge’s approval before drawing a blood sample.
The case stemmed from the Oct. 3, 2010, arrest of Tyler McNeely in rural Cape Girardeau County.
A state trooper stopped McNeely after he observed his car speeding and swerving. McNeely, who had two previous drunken-driving convictions, refused to submit to a breath test to measure the alcohol level in his body. He also failed several field sobriety tests. The arresting officer, Cpl. Mark Winder of the Missouri Highway Patrol, said McNeely’s speech was slurred.
Winder did not attempt to get a warrant but drove McNeely to a hospital, where a technician drew his blood. McNeely’s blood alcohol content was 0.154 percent, well above the 0.08 percent legal limit.
After a circuit court threw out the test results, the Missouri Supreme Court upheld that action, saying that the blood test violated the Constitution. Police need a warrant to take a suspect’s blood except when a delay could threaten a life or destroy potential evidence, the Missouri court added. About half the states already prohibit warrantless blood tests in all or most suspected drunken-driving cases.
Bonney, of the local ACLU office, filed a brief with the Missouri Supreme Court on the McNeely case. McNeely’s lawyer then asked the ACLU to argue Missouri v. McNeely before the Supreme Court. Steve Shapiro, the organization’s national legal director, did so in January, and Bonney attended the arguments. Zahnd, meanwhile, is continuing on other fronts with efforts to expedite evidence-gathering in possible drunken-driving cases.
The Missouri Association of Prosecuting Attorneys, he said, is supporting House Bill 461, pending legislation that would add a subsection to the state’s evidence-tampering statute saying that a suspected drunk driver who refuses to provide a breath or blood sample would be charged with that offense.
warrantless blood tests in DUI cases
By: Brian Burnes of the KC Star
Missouri’s push to more easily draw blood from people suspected of driving drunk failed to convince U.S. Supreme Court justices Wednesday. Law enforcement must continue to seek warrants to take blood from drivers stopped for possibly driving impaired, the court ruled in a case that originated in southeast Missouri. More than 30 other states and the Obama administration had joined Missouri in asking justices to give officers almost complete discretion in drawing blood samples without a warrant.
The ruling thrilled Doug Bonney, chief counsel with the American Civil Liberties Union of Kansas and Western Missouri office in Kansas City.
“It shows that the court understood that drunk-driving laws can be enforced in a way that is consistent with the Constitution,” said Bonney, referring to the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.
At least the court left in place current procedures for obtaining such blood tests, said Eric Zahnd, Platte County prosecutor who also is head of the Missouri Association of Prosecuting Attorneys.
“The good news is that those tests will still be an arrow in the quiver of law enforcement in appropriate circumstances,” Zahnd said. “I am heartened that the court continues to recognize that alcohol dissipates naturally from the blood and therefore time is of the essence in these cases.”
The Supreme Court held that police usually must try to obtain a search warrant from a judge before ordering blood tests for drunken-driving suspects.
In their 8-1 ruling, justices sided with a Missouri man who had been subjected to a blood test without a warrant and was found to have nearly twice the legal limit of alcohol in his blood. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote for the court that the natural dissipation of alcohol in the blood is generally not sufficient reason to dispense with the requirement that police get a judge’s approval before drawing a blood sample.
The case stemmed from the Oct. 3, 2010, arrest of Tyler McNeely in rural Cape Girardeau County.
A state trooper stopped McNeely after he observed his car speeding and swerving. McNeely, who had two previous drunken-driving convictions, refused to submit to a breath test to measure the alcohol level in his body. He also failed several field sobriety tests. The arresting officer, Cpl. Mark Winder of the Missouri Highway Patrol, said McNeely’s speech was slurred.
Winder did not attempt to get a warrant but drove McNeely to a hospital, where a technician drew his blood. McNeely’s blood alcohol content was 0.154 percent, well above the 0.08 percent legal limit.
After a circuit court threw out the test results, the Missouri Supreme Court upheld that action, saying that the blood test violated the Constitution. Police need a warrant to take a suspect’s blood except when a delay could threaten a life or destroy potential evidence, the Missouri court added. About half the states already prohibit warrantless blood tests in all or most suspected drunken-driving cases.
Bonney, of the local ACLU office, filed a brief with the Missouri Supreme Court on the McNeely case. McNeely’s lawyer then asked the ACLU to argue Missouri v. McNeely before the Supreme Court. Steve Shapiro, the organization’s national legal director, did so in January, and Bonney attended the arguments. Zahnd, meanwhile, is continuing on other fronts with efforts to expedite evidence-gathering in possible drunken-driving cases.
The Missouri Association of Prosecuting Attorneys, he said, is supporting House Bill 461, pending legislation that would add a subsection to the state’s evidence-tampering statute saying that a suspected drunk driver who refuses to provide a breath or blood sample would be charged with that offense.
Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/2013/04/17/4187515/supreme-court-denies-missouris.html#storylink=cpy
Labels:
missouir dui cases,
missouri supreme court,
new supreme court cases,
Supreme court on dui cases
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
KU football player arrested for suspicion of DUI and other charges.
DUI is a unique crime that many people, from all walks of life can easily find themselves charged with in the state of Kansas. If you've been charged with a DUI it doesn't mean you're a bad person. DUI charges are usually the result of an error in judgment. People usually don't consciously drive under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol. What is more common is that people drive under the mistaken belief that they are "okay"; to drive. Of course, most people aren't equipped to determine what their blood alcohol concentration (BAC) is before they start driving.
Most people that are charged with a DUI in Kansas know that it is a serious charge but beyond that have no idea what to do. They find themselves with many questions and concerns but because they have never been in trouble before they do not know where to turn, or they are embarrassed and are unwilling to seek help. From the outset there are very important deadlines that need to be met to preserve not only your freedom but your privilege to drive. In Kansas, simply one missed deadline will cause you to automatically loose your ability to contest the suspension of your driver's license.
From the start of your DUI case you need the help of an experienced DUI defense attorney. You need to sit down with an attorney that can give you some honest and accurate advice, based on experience handling these types of cases. The DUI laws change nearly every year and the consequences of those changes can way heavily on your case.
The article is below.
KU Football player Nick Sizemore arrest on suspicion of DUI, leaving the scene of an accident
by Ian Cummings
A senior Kansas University football player has been suspended after being arrested early Sunday morning on suspicion of DUI early Sunday morning in the 1800 block of West Sixth Street. Nicolas Wade Sizemore, 22, Lititz, Pa., was stopped by police for driving without headlights just after midnight, said Sgt. Trent McKinley, a Lawrence Police Department spokesman. Officers suspected that Sizemore was intoxicated and had struck a parked vehicle in the parking lot of The Ranch, 2515 W. Sixth St., minutes before being stopped. He was booked into Douglas County Jail on suspicion of DUI and leaving the scene of a noninjury accident.
Sizemore was issued a notice to appear in Lawrence Municipal Court on May 1 and was released from jail on a $700 bond. Kansas football coach Charlie Weis announced Monday morning that Sizemore, a senior tight end, has been suspended for the first three games of the 2013 season for a violation of team rules, according to a news release from Kansas Athletics.
“As I have previously stated, every player on our team knows and understands our rules and regulations,” Weis said in the statement. “They also know the consequences for violations.”
Labels:
dui charges in kansas,
kansas footbal player arrested for dui,
ku football,
ku football player arrested,
nick sizemore
Monday, April 15, 2013
Liberty Man seriously injured in Platte County accident
Vincent Vangundy age 60, of Liberty Missouri was seriously injured in a on April 12, 2013. According to SGT. D.J. Hendrick of the Missouri Highway patrol the accident occurred at midnight on Interstate 29 Southbound. The details of the accident appear to be that a 2002 Ford Windstar driven by Vincent Vangundy was traveling southbound when a 2012 Ford driven by Joshua Simon rear ended the Ford Windstar. The rear end accident then caused Mr. Vangundy to lose control and go off the right side of the roadway. The 2002 Windstar then slid down the embankment and overturned.
After the accident Mr. Vangundy was transported to Liberty Hospital by ambulance where he was listed as in serious condition.
Police Report only online for 30 Days
When seriously injured in an incident like this you need to obtain an experienced personal injury lawyer to investigate the facts and determine whom is at fault. If you or a loved one find themselves in need of an experienced personal injury lawyer please contact the attorneys of Copley Roth and Wilson LLC. Our firm has extensive experience handling personal injury and wrongful death claims and is here to compassionately assist you in your time of need. If you, a loved one, or a family member has suffered the devastating , and oftentimes tragic consequences of failed security, please do not hesitate to contact Copley Roth and Wilson, LLC (913-451-9500) to address any questions or concerns you may have. The initial consultation(s) telephone and in person, are always free.
After the accident Mr. Vangundy was transported to Liberty Hospital by ambulance where he was listed as in serious condition.
Police Report only online for 30 Days
When seriously injured in an incident like this you need to obtain an experienced personal injury lawyer to investigate the facts and determine whom is at fault. If you or a loved one find themselves in need of an experienced personal injury lawyer please contact the attorneys of Copley Roth and Wilson LLC. Our firm has extensive experience handling personal injury and wrongful death claims and is here to compassionately assist you in your time of need. If you, a loved one, or a family member has suffered the devastating , and oftentimes tragic consequences of failed security, please do not hesitate to contact Copley Roth and Wilson, LLC (913-451-9500) to address any questions or concerns you may have. The initial consultation(s) telephone and in person, are always free.
Labels:
accident vincent vangundy,
Platte County Accident,
vincent vangundy,
vincent vangundy accident
Saturday, April 13, 2013
Raytown Attorney pleads guilty to fraud in Porter Case.
Raytown Attorney pleads guilty to fraud in Porter Case
By: Judy Thomas of the Kansas City Star
A former Jackson County lawyer pleaded guilty in federal court on Thursday to stealing money from a memorial fund set up in 2007 for two children murdered by their father.
Kent Desselle, 62, pleaded guilty to one count of bank fraud
involving a fund for Sam and Lindsey Porter and one count of bankruptcy
fraud in another case. Without pleading guilty, Desselle also admitted
that he defrauded the widow of a lifelong friend of hundreds of
thousands of dollars in an investment scheme.
“A disbarred attorney took advantage of his clients, including a grieving mother and a friend’s widow, to line his own pockets,” said U.S. Attorney Tammy Dickinson in a statement released after the sentencing. “He abused his clients and he abused the legal system for a client who declared bankruptcy. With Thursday’s guilty plea, he will be held accountable for his flagrant misconduct.”
Desselle, of Raytown, was an attorney in private practice when he began managing a foundation and set up a bank account to handle donations to build a playground in memory of Sam and Lindsey Porter. The children, ages 7 and 8, were shot to death in 2004 by their father, Dan Porter, in a case that captured national attention. Their bodies weren’t discovered until 2007. A federal grand jury indicted Desselle in April 2012 for allegedly stealing from three clients, including the Porter fund. The six-count indictment alleged wire fraud, bank fraud, bankruptcy fraud and making a false oath in a bankruptcy case. In Thursday’s plea agreement, Desselle pleaded guilty to two of the six counts. He stood before U.S. District Judge Dean Whipple in a tan corduroy jacket and said he clearly understood the charges.
The government recommended a sentence of 33 to 41 months in federal prison without parole. Whipple said he would hold a sentencing hearing for Desselle after the U.S. Probation Office completes a pre-sentence investigation.
Under the terms of the agreement, Desselle also must pay $343,045 in restitution to the widow he defrauded and $5,749 restitution in the bankruptcy case. Tina Porter, mother of the murdered children, said she was surprised at the plea agreement terms. “I think they went very easy on him,” Porter said of Desselle. “He took advantage of so many people, and this just doesn’t make any sense to me.
“I’m glad they pursued this for as long and as hard as they did, but I’m very disappointed in Kent for not taking full responsibility for everything. I really thought he was a good guy. I trusted him, and he betrayed us.”
In the Porter scheme, Desselle set up a foundation for children called samandlindsey.org and told Tina Porter that he would handle the memorial fund account at the Bank of Grain Valley. He was the only person who could sign the foundation checks. Tina Porter asked Desselle for documents related to the account on several occasions, but he refused to produce them.
In October 2007, Desselle wrote a $12,000 check drawn on the foundation's account and put it in his law firm trust account, according to the indictment. Four days later, he wrote a $7,500 check made out to New Century Investments, a company he owned, and deposited it into his New Century account, the indictment alleges. Tina Porter did not know about either check.
Desselle came under scrutiny in February 2008 when The Kansas City Star reported that he had invested money that had been donated to the Sam and Lindsey Porter Memorial Fund into his own company. As soon as Tina Porter learned of the misappropriations, she ordered Desselle to return the money. He did so within a few days after The Star's story ran, and the playground was built in June 2008.
A second scheme involved a woman Desselle represented in a 2008 bankruptcy case. According to prosecutors, Desselle told the woman to sell a motorcycle that she owned and give him the proceeds, which she thought he would place in the law firm's trust account and use to pay some of her creditors. The woman sold the motorcycle for $13,500, the indictment says, keeping $500 and giving the rest to Desselle.
When Desselle filed the bankruptcy petition, the document did not include the $13,000 he received from the motorcycle sale, the indictment says. The bankruptcy court ordered him to refund the money, but he kept more than $5,700. Desselle also acknowledged in his plea agreement that he defrauded Nancy Clifton, who received life insurance proceeds in 1996 after her husband was killed in a traffic accident. According to the indictment, Desselle invested about $500,000 for Clifton, putting it in his own company and promising her high yields.
Desselle created phony documents to make Clifton think she was receiving interest payments, the indictment alleges, but the funds actually came from Desselle's law firm or from his own family members. One payment even came from the Sam and Lindsey Porter account. Desselle told Clifton in 2006 and 2007 that her investments were worth more than $600,000 when he actually had lost all of her money years earlier, the indictment says.
When Clifton read The Star's story in 2008 about Desselle's handling of the Porter case, she demanded that he liquidate her investments immediately. Desselle eventually told Clifton that he'd lost all of her investments. Desselle was disbarred in 2009 by the Missouri Supreme Court, which found him guilty of multiple violations of the rules of professional conduct that govern attorneys. He had been the subject of numerous complaints filed the year before, most of which accused him of mishandling clients’ money.
Clifton and her son, Andrew, sat in the courtroom Thursday and watched as Desselle pleaded guilty. After the hearing, Desselle walked over to them and put his hand on Andrew Clifton’s shoulder.
“He said he’s going to write a book and then use the proceeds to pay her back,” Andrew Clifton said later, shaking his head. “I’ve known Kent all my life; we went to school with his kids. I’m not as concerned about his being punished as I am about him paying his debt to society and not being in a position where he can do this to other families.”
After the hearing, Nancy Clifton said Desselle was a longtime friend of her husband. The two had gone to high school together, she said, and Desselle was the best man at her husband’s first wedding. When her husband died, Desselle attended the funeral and offered to help her with legal matters. That’s when she let him invest her life insurance. “This has been horrible,” she said. “It affected my retirement completely. I would have been set for life. Now, I have to worry about my future.
“It’s one thing to be taken advantage of by a stranger, but when it’s someone you trusted who was a family friend ….”
“A disbarred attorney took advantage of his clients, including a grieving mother and a friend’s widow, to line his own pockets,” said U.S. Attorney Tammy Dickinson in a statement released after the sentencing. “He abused his clients and he abused the legal system for a client who declared bankruptcy. With Thursday’s guilty plea, he will be held accountable for his flagrant misconduct.”
Desselle, of Raytown, was an attorney in private practice when he began managing a foundation and set up a bank account to handle donations to build a playground in memory of Sam and Lindsey Porter. The children, ages 7 and 8, were shot to death in 2004 by their father, Dan Porter, in a case that captured national attention. Their bodies weren’t discovered until 2007. A federal grand jury indicted Desselle in April 2012 for allegedly stealing from three clients, including the Porter fund. The six-count indictment alleged wire fraud, bank fraud, bankruptcy fraud and making a false oath in a bankruptcy case. In Thursday’s plea agreement, Desselle pleaded guilty to two of the six counts. He stood before U.S. District Judge Dean Whipple in a tan corduroy jacket and said he clearly understood the charges.
The government recommended a sentence of 33 to 41 months in federal prison without parole. Whipple said he would hold a sentencing hearing for Desselle after the U.S. Probation Office completes a pre-sentence investigation.
Under the terms of the agreement, Desselle also must pay $343,045 in restitution to the widow he defrauded and $5,749 restitution in the bankruptcy case. Tina Porter, mother of the murdered children, said she was surprised at the plea agreement terms. “I think they went very easy on him,” Porter said of Desselle. “He took advantage of so many people, and this just doesn’t make any sense to me.
“I’m glad they pursued this for as long and as hard as they did, but I’m very disappointed in Kent for not taking full responsibility for everything. I really thought he was a good guy. I trusted him, and he betrayed us.”
In the Porter scheme, Desselle set up a foundation for children called samandlindsey.org and told Tina Porter that he would handle the memorial fund account at the Bank of Grain Valley. He was the only person who could sign the foundation checks. Tina Porter asked Desselle for documents related to the account on several occasions, but he refused to produce them.
In October 2007, Desselle wrote a $12,000 check drawn on the foundation's account and put it in his law firm trust account, according to the indictment. Four days later, he wrote a $7,500 check made out to New Century Investments, a company he owned, and deposited it into his New Century account, the indictment alleges. Tina Porter did not know about either check.
Desselle came under scrutiny in February 2008 when The Kansas City Star reported that he had invested money that had been donated to the Sam and Lindsey Porter Memorial Fund into his own company. As soon as Tina Porter learned of the misappropriations, she ordered Desselle to return the money. He did so within a few days after The Star's story ran, and the playground was built in June 2008.
A second scheme involved a woman Desselle represented in a 2008 bankruptcy case. According to prosecutors, Desselle told the woman to sell a motorcycle that she owned and give him the proceeds, which she thought he would place in the law firm's trust account and use to pay some of her creditors. The woman sold the motorcycle for $13,500, the indictment says, keeping $500 and giving the rest to Desselle.
When Desselle filed the bankruptcy petition, the document did not include the $13,000 he received from the motorcycle sale, the indictment says. The bankruptcy court ordered him to refund the money, but he kept more than $5,700. Desselle also acknowledged in his plea agreement that he defrauded Nancy Clifton, who received life insurance proceeds in 1996 after her husband was killed in a traffic accident. According to the indictment, Desselle invested about $500,000 for Clifton, putting it in his own company and promising her high yields.
Desselle created phony documents to make Clifton think she was receiving interest payments, the indictment alleges, but the funds actually came from Desselle's law firm or from his own family members. One payment even came from the Sam and Lindsey Porter account. Desselle told Clifton in 2006 and 2007 that her investments were worth more than $600,000 when he actually had lost all of her money years earlier, the indictment says.
When Clifton read The Star's story in 2008 about Desselle's handling of the Porter case, she demanded that he liquidate her investments immediately. Desselle eventually told Clifton that he'd lost all of her investments. Desselle was disbarred in 2009 by the Missouri Supreme Court, which found him guilty of multiple violations of the rules of professional conduct that govern attorneys. He had been the subject of numerous complaints filed the year before, most of which accused him of mishandling clients’ money.
Clifton and her son, Andrew, sat in the courtroom Thursday and watched as Desselle pleaded guilty. After the hearing, Desselle walked over to them and put his hand on Andrew Clifton’s shoulder.
“He said he’s going to write a book and then use the proceeds to pay her back,” Andrew Clifton said later, shaking his head. “I’ve known Kent all my life; we went to school with his kids. I’m not as concerned about his being punished as I am about him paying his debt to society and not being in a position where he can do this to other families.”
After the hearing, Nancy Clifton said Desselle was a longtime friend of her husband. The two had gone to high school together, she said, and Desselle was the best man at her husband’s first wedding. When her husband died, Desselle attended the funeral and offered to help her with legal matters. That’s when she let him invest her life insurance. “This has been horrible,” she said. “It affected my retirement completely. I would have been set for life. Now, I have to worry about my future.
“It’s one thing to be taken advantage of by a stranger, but when it’s someone you trusted who was a family friend ….”
Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/2013/04/12/4175996/raytown-attorney-pleads-guilty.html#storylink=cpy
Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/2013/04/12/4175996/raytown-attorney-pleads-guilty.html#storylink=cpy
Wednesday, April 10, 2013
One of the top reasons British get divorced...#1 Wife drinks too much
Came across this brief article in the Huffington Post. I'm not sure this is true in the states..What do you think.
Divorce Causes: A rising Number of Divorces are being Blamed on Wives' Drinking says UK Lawyer
A growing number of Brits are citing alcohol as a contributing factor
in their divorces -- and it's the wives who have the drinking problem
in the majority of the cases, according to one divorce attorney.
Family law attorney Amanda McAlister told the Daily Mail Wednesday
that she sees 40 to 50 divorce cases every year where drinking played a
part in the marital breakdown. By her calculations, the number of men
citing alcohol as a cause in these cases has risen by 70 percent in the
last five years.
"Husbands will often initially cite a different reason for divorce, such as that their wife doesn’t work or help around the house," McAlister told the newspaper. "It only later comes to light that the reason she’s not doing so is because she’s often drunk or nursing a hangover."
It's not the first time the link between drinking and divorce has been in the news as of late. In February 2013, researchers from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health found that heavy drinking and incompatible drinking -- where one spouse consumes far more alcohol than the other -- increase the chance of divorce. The risk of divorce was especially high when the wife was the one imbibing.
Divorce Causes: A rising Number of Divorces are being Blamed on Wives' Drinking says UK Lawyer
Family law attorney Amanda McAlister told the Daily Mail Wednesday
"Husbands will often initially cite a different reason for divorce, such as that their wife doesn’t work or help around the house," McAlister told the newspaper. "It only later comes to light that the reason she’s not doing so is because she’s often drunk or nursing a hangover."
It's not the first time the link between drinking and divorce has been in the news as of late. In February 2013, researchers from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health found that heavy drinking and incompatible drinking -- where one spouse consumes far more alcohol than the other -- increase the chance of divorce. The risk of divorce was especially high when the wife was the one imbibing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)